The politics of visiting the British Museum: An emotional encounter with the land

5th August 2022
BY ROCÍO VERA-FLORES| POSTED IN News

Last month I travelled from Leiden to London to visit the British Museum (27-29.07.2022). There, I had an emotional encounter with the Tepetlaoztoc Codex (also known as Kingsborough Codex), a document which, in my opinion, we must study outside classic arguments. These arguments solely deal with the inhuman tribute depicted in its pages, censoring the violence and crimes committed against my ancestors, which continue to be felt through massive land dispossession in Mexico. Land commercialisation and abandonment on part of governments during the last three decades have resulted in the inability to make important decisions with regard to where to urbanise or not.

 

Tepetlaoztoc Codex ©Trustees of The British Museum

Tepetlaoztoc Codex and Rocío Vera-Flores ©Trustees of The British Museum

 

The Tepetlaoztoc Codex visually synthesises the traumatic transformation of the relationship with landscape caused by colonisation, as well as the ecocentric concept of the land as ‘mother land’ and living being (strongly defended by Indigenous peoples and allies around the world). Its first pages illustrate the face of the land and its naturalistic representation using the bodies and mouths of snakes. In contrast, the pages inside the codex document the dismemberment of the land as a material possession, understood by the Spanish colonizers as land and market. They also represents the ways that these colonisers violently subjugated the Indigenous population.

 

©Trustees of The British Museum

©Trustees of The British Museum

 

It seems to me that unlike other conversations about repatriation that take place in the British Museum, in the case of Mexico, internal colonisation is still pending. For example, people frame cities as sacred temples and not as material evidence of colonial crimes. What is happening in Mexico: Are there no large groups of people demanding, outside of the case of auction houses, that our heritage is not sold, for example? I think that there is no single answer to this question, but it seems that all of the answers have to do with land and require us to excavate our own colonial mentality. This would be necessary for us to be recognised as guardians of our land.

Thanks to Laura Osorio, Magdalena Araus and Mercedes Martínez from the Santo Domingo Centre of Excellence for Latin American Research for the invitation, as well as James Dear from the Collections Care Department at the British Museum.

Publications related to women’s and maternal health with Wixárika communities by the author of this exhibition

 

Gamlin, Jennie B. (2013)
Shame as a barrier to health seeking among indigenous Huichol migrant labourers: An interpretive approach of the “violence continuum” and “authoritative knowledge”
Social Science and Medicine 97 75-81

Gamlin, Jennie B. (2023)
Wixárika Practices of Medical Syncretism: An Ontological Proposal for Health in the Anthropocene
Medical Anthropology Theory 10 (2) 1-26

Gamlin, Jennie B. (2020)
“You see, we women, we can’t talk, we can’t have an opinion…”. The coloniality of gender and childbirth practices in Indigenous Wixárika families
Social Science and Medicine 252, 112912

Jennie Gamlin and David Osrin (2020)
Preventable infant deaths, lone births and lack of registration in Mexican indigenous communities: health care services and the afterlife of colonialism
Ethnicity and Health 25 (7)

Jennie Gamlin and Seth Holmes (2018)
Preventable perinatal deaths in indigenous Wixárika communities: an ethnographic study of pregnancy, childbirth and structural violence BMC
Pregnancy and Childbirth 18 (Article number 243) 2018

Gamlin, Jennie B. and Sarah J Hawkes (2015)
Pregnancy and birth in an Indigenous Huichol community: from structural violence to structural policy responses
Culture, health and sexuality 17 (1)

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Email